make money online

Worried About Being Bitch Slapped By Google? Me Neither

My man on the inside has been telling me that Google is going around manually adjusting the PageRank on quite a few sites - and so far it’s all been going down!

The most noticeable bitch slaps so far have been:

Webmasters everywhere are up in arms that it is due to the selling of paid links and those of them who don’t actually sell links seem to have ignored the fact that Google sometimes decreases PR anyway and are claiming that Google has incorrectly labeled them as a link seller. Boo hoo…

Thank you Google

From my perspective, this is absolutely brilliant. Google is working hard to build the most accurate and reputable search engine available and eliminate the completely absurd and manipulated results that you get for searches like “make money online“.

I’m a “power user” of Google and getting the results that I want easier and faster will only save me time and money.

If you get slapped…you probably deserve it

What a lot of people seem to miss is that Google wants the most accurate results. If you suddenly find yourself slipping a few pages in the rankings, you probably didn’t deserve to have your great positioning in the first place. Look at the top #10 for “make money online” - most of them shouldn’t even rank in the top #100!

And for every webmaster who gets dropped - another more relevant one will rise!

Being thrown out of the Google index entirely is the extreme end of this and you have to really p*ss Google off for this to happen.

John Chow is the obvious example of this where he outlandishly exploited their system and now he doesn’t even rank for his own name - but that makes Google look bad!

If anybody does a search for JC on Google, they’re not going to be able to find him and that really hurts Google’s reputation as a quality resource. For them to take that damage, your actions must cause greater damage than the hit to their reputation from them not providing a relevant result.

Not all slaps are equal

With the slaps so far supposedly coming manually, it should be noted that any ranking decreases will not happen to everyone. There are many, many reputable online newspapers and companies who partake in the practice of buying and selling links and will definitely not have their rankings penalized.

The New York Times is a notable example where they are in the business of selling links from their pages - and they’re not “no follow” either - but can you ever imagine a situation where they are penalized and the NY Times homepage isn’t #1 in a search for “new york times”? Ain’t gonna happen!

PayPerPost and Text Link Ads must be sweating

Both PayPerPost and Text Link Ads rely very heavily on PR in setting their prices and generating increased income. With sites that sell their PR getting penalized, these companies are essentially losing their assets and they’re going to have to find a new system.

But consider this - if PPP actually sold posts based upon the amount of traffic that it generated, you’d have less advertisers complaining about “garbage posts” that didn’t bring them any customers and they’d probably be able to actually charge advertisers a higher price than they do now. The blogger, advertiser and PPP would all make more money.

Life’s sweet in an honest world.

I’ll still be selling

While it can’t be done for all sites, part of my money making strategy on CashQuests has never really involved Google. The traffic they’ve sent me has always been pathetic and realistically it isn’t the type of traffic that I desire. I’d trade 50 visitors from Google for 1 visitor that comes via a recommendation on another site.

All my link and paid review prices have also been determined based upon the amount of traffic that they will generate and not any PR. I admit that the fact CashQuests is currently PR0 has a lot to do with that but it simply means that if Google bitch slapped me tomorrow it would still be “situation normal”.

What me worry?


Rich people subscribe to Cash Quests




15 Comments »

I’m not worried either.

Pretty soon TLA, PPP etc…will realize that every blogger in their database has dropping PR’s, mostly due to their services, so they need to get rid of that metric and think of something else.

Can’t live with them, can’t live without them. :twisted:

by Hyder

 

nice post.

By the way, the link to payperpost as an error…

by Ricardo Dias

 

Thanks for the post. I agree 100%. Google is doing it’s best to get the best results. I will continue on selling links at this time.

by knupNET

 

For those of us with PR currently, the slap can hurt, pretty bad. Since TLA / SR / RM / PPP et al use PR as one of their main metrics, we get slapped pretty harshly for a PR drop. The same quality reviews / links are now worth significantly less than they were.

You are on the flip side of the coin - you’re operating without PR right now, so it has little to no affect on you. Unfortunately, not everyone is in the same boat as you are.

by Leroy Brown

 

I disagree that if you get slapped you probably deserved it. I believe people who have purposely google bombed google with search terms to get ahead should be punished however this rule is affecting everyone, not just those who abused the system.

There are hundreds of thousands of websites who will be hit with this big time because a large part of their income depends on selling text links. You may argue that it’s their own fault for not seeking other sources but for some sites it’s just not impossible.

For example, some content sites take a lot of time to update but struggle to make cash. No one is there to buy anything so amazon ads etc wont convert well. Also, selling ads on a CPM basis wont work too well either because impressions will be low (whereas an arcade or joke site could get more impressions within a month or two simply because more people search for it).

I’m actually in a similar position to you ie. I don’t get too much traffic from google just now and my blog does not depend on it. However, the main reason for that is because our blogs are still relatively new (around 6 months ish). In a years time when we have 2 or 3 times more articles to get spidered traffic from google should be a more reliable source of traffic.

I can understand why google is putting these measures in however it’s hard not to critize them - the biggest search company on the web is also the biggest advertising company. With TLA and other such sites gone a lot of people will turn to adwords….which is of course a huge part of their business. Monopoly commission anyone?

by Kevin Muldoon

 

It’s sad that this is happening. Many webmasters were earning a lot of money selling links, not this slap will make you think twice before you add TLA to your website.

by BlogsTheme.com

 

As Kevin pointed out, with Google having most (80-90% ?) of the search market plus having about 40% of the online advertising market, monopoly investigations are in their near future if they make enough people mad. Suits against Microsoft, IBM, and AT&T got started because aggressive tactics were hurting other businesses.

The real question is does toolbar PR affect search results? Apparently it doesn’t have a significant effect itself but the real and more granular PR measure that Google keeps hidden does. Perhaps they should simply divorce the two metrics and let people go nuts selling toolbar PR. They could probably work an angle to make even more money on it then.

by Frank C

 

I just means that people are going to have to get smarter about selling text links. Take down the advertise here pages and start selling single post, in content links. Google can’t possibly tell if they are natural links or not. Plus in content links usually pass more PageRank then sidebar links anyways. :evil:

by Ryan

 

haha that is tru google is ok when sending traffic - I like direct traffic which is more viral since its by word of mouth

direct linking is something that google can not take away

by ianternet

 

The way I see it, all this means is that the rest of the Internet is going to have to adjust around what Google decides to do, or has decided to do already. All it requires is a general shift down a peg and then things can get back to normal. Essentially, it makes it harder to achieve a PR5, but then a PR4 becomes more prestigious.

by Angel

 

Ha ha ha..
Just slap google again…
:twisted:

by shy guy

 

Please change all your “feature links” “sponsored links” to something else like “cool sites” or “resources” on your paid links and give those links a rel=”nofollow”..Something i learnt from matt cutts, while this may not be truth but it what he had mention before the massacre of dropping pageranks…
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/text-links-and-pagerank/

by Etienne Teo

 

interesting the way you think :P

by Marc Eilbeck

 

It is good that Google is improving the result. However, if the blog is already pulling traffic and profitable, I don’t really care the pagerank Google is giving.

by KPeBiz

 

[…] Cashquests’ post about Google penalizing link sellers popped into my head and when I checked out the state of the blogosphere if there more cases of this type, I whew-ed when I’ve learned that it’s not just me. Here are other bloggers’ pagerank decrease mentions: […]

by Apple Door Says NO to Bundy Clocks » Google is Punishing TLA Publishers through PageRank Decrease

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.